Cases 11 - 20 of 575
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
El-Bey v. Howard et al
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
John Addison Howard, Jennifer B. Schiffer, Robert Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogunlana v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Johnson B. Ogunlana
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rahman v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Raheem Rahman
Defendant:
J. Nines, Tames, Yes Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Frank V. Rainey
Defendant:
B. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Maurice Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day, Judge Peter J. Messitte, John Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Schiffer
as 1:2023cv02949
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Jennifer B. Schiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02799
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dicks v. Yes Care Medical Company et al
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph Dicks, Sr.
Defendant:
Yes Care Medical Company, Corizon Medical Company, Vincent O. Nwusor, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02433
Plaintiff:
Travis Everett Jones
Defendant:
Supervising Clerk of District Court of Maryland, T. Richardson, Commissioner Hesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
