Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Bennett v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Marshal Turner, Lee Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bennett v. USA
as 1:2019cv00896
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Larry Fort Bennett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Meridith v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
Latoya Bennett, Lauderdale County Detention Facility, Billie Sollie and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Deon Meridith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rainey et al
as 3:2018cv00794
Defendant:
Jane Larson, Lauderdale County, Miria Rainey and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Monice Jones
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Ofc. Anthony Coleman, Sgt. Latoya Bennett, Major Melissa McCarter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Defendant:
Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. State of Ms
as 3:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dillon W. Bennett
Defendant:
State of Ms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald et al v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. McDonald, Joshua M. Lofton, Jacob Champion and others
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Morris et al
as 4:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Devin A. Bennett
Defendant:
Norris Morris, Timothy Morris, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
