Cases 11 - 20 of 23
VICKERY v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCE et al
as 2:2020cv00566
Defendant:
CHERYL PETTY, JANE DOE, MICHEAL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY VICKERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. USA
as 2:2020cv00127
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Carey Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
THOMAS v. BABCZAK et al
as 1:2020cv00598
Defendant:
BRIAN M. BABCZAK, JOSH CAREY and HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
REGGIE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HAGENMAIER et al
as 1:2018cv03654
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, SHANNON LOGSDON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02625
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, SHANNON LOGSDON, ROBYN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. US PENITENTIARY - CANAAN et al
as 2:2015cv00367
Defendant:
BURKETT, CAREY, DOBUSHAK and others
Plaintiff:
RANDEEP SINGH MANN
Names Unknown:
PHARMACISTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRELL v. ELROD et al
as 2:2012cv00189
Defendant:
CHARLENE BURKETT, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES/CORIZON, JOHN DALLAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRELL v. ELROD et al
as 2:2012cv00186
Defendant:
CHARLENE BURKETT, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES/CORIZON, JOHN DALLAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMLET v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2012cv00700
Defendant:
OFC. ABNEY, MARK J. BOWEN, OFC. CALHOUN and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2011cv01052
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, DR. O'BRIAN and CAREY HARRIS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
