Cases 11 - 20 of 2,425
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Mark Hayes
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Clark
as 1:2024cv00272
Petitioner:
James Robert Nelson
Respondent:
Harold Clark and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Clarke of Mental Health at Sussex I State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Kemsy Bowles, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, K. Burcham, CJ MacVean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Defendant:
Valarie Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Anderson, B.L. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
