Cases 11 - 20 of 449
Flores v. Daniels et al
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Adrian Flores
Defendant:
J.A. Daniels and Richlands Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Najacque v. City of Hampton Commonwealth VA et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Najacque
Defendant:
City of Hampton Commonwealth VA and Detective Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Anderson, B.L. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Ms. R.D. Young, Mr. Joseph B. Stallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamm v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Lamm
Defendant:
United States of America, Mr. McCrae, Ms. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeting v. Mack et al
as 2:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sweeting
Defendant:
Captain Mack, Captain Bagwrath, Captain Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00836
Petitioner:
Charncey Laquinn Daniels
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
