Cases 11 - 20 of 157
Shalders v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 1:2022cv12231
Plaintiff:
Gloria Shalders
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Rebecca Stafford Sykes, Kelvin Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fabrikant v. Karapetian
as 1:2022cv12157
Plaintiff:
Dr. V.I Fabrikant
Defendant:
Dr E Karapetian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11654
Plaintiff:
Vibron Lloyd
Defendant:
Jose E. Almeida, Bryan Hanson and Geoff Martha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez Cruz v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 4:2022cv40103
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez Cruz
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, Thomas Quinn, C.P.E.S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. York County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv10269
Plaintiff:
George E Bradley
Defendant:
York County Sheriff, Portland City Police, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Bradley v. The York County Sheriff.
as 1:2022cv10189
Plaintiff:
George E Bradley
Defendant:
The York County Sheriff.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv10183
Petitioner:
Mark E. Taylor
Respondent:
Lisa Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe v. Dumornay et al
as 1:2021cv12073
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Mitchell Dumornay, Amanda Matteson, DeMoura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herriott v. Burton
as 1:2021cv11984
Plaintiff:
Kevin E Herriott
Defendant:
Charles Burton and Douglas Demoura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Bristol Superior Court et al
as 1:2021cv11819
Plaintiff:
Victor L Melendez
Defendant:
Bristol Superior Court, C.P.C.S, Frances E Viera Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
