Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Swopes v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv04796
Petitioner:
Sherman Swopes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Centeno et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv03315
Defendant:
T. Sherman, Illinois Department of Corrections, Daly and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Centeno and Raul Dorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCollum v. Miles et al
as 1:2020cv03218
Defendant:
Clarke, Krewer, Jane Doe Nurse #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert McCollum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jilton v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Doctor Taylor, Jane and John Does, Doctor Advani and others
Plaintiff:
Shermon Jilton and Sherman Jilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morissette v. Henze et al
as 1:2019cv04945
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Gosh, Obasis and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Morissette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cook County et al
as 1:2019cv03076
Plaintiff:
Donche Hall, Jamon Dantzler, William Baber and others
Defendant:
John Doe and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Brooks et al
as 1:2018cv07772
Defendant:
Dominguez, Sherman, Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penaloza v. C.C.D.O.C/Division 11 et al
as 1:2017cv07058
Plaintiff:
Nino Penaloza
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C/Division 11, Sherman, Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
