Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Mays v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv00048
Plaintiff: Paul Mays
Defendant: Kentucky Department of Corrections, Webb Strange, Cordant Health Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. USA
as 1:2016cv00137
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Tremayne Donshay Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. Allen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00071
Plaintiff: Michael Stewart
Defendant: Danny Allen and R.N. Christy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Goins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00151
Plaintiff: Alberto Harris
Defendant: William Goins, Patrick Robinson, Unlawful Narcotics Investigations, Treatment and Education, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSpain v. City of Louisville et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00602
Plaintiff: Michael Ray DeSpain
Defendant: City of Louisville, Steven Conrad, Kit Stemile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 1:2014cv00098
Petitioner: Willie James Stewart
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Delehanty v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00076
Plaintiff: Timothy Delehanty
Defendant: Smith, Stevens and Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stumbaugh v. Boyd County et al
as 0:2013cv00032
Plaintiff: Stewart O. Stumbaugh
Defendant: Boyd County, Joe Burchett, Rebecca Greenhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. USA
as 5:2012cv07251
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Dante Demetrius Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?