Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robles v. O'Shea et al
as 3:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Robles
Defendant:
Peter O'Shea, Maher Kasabji and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gojcaj v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Marash Gojcaj
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi, Umprakash Pillai, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Bristol Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
Bristol Police Department, Lance Podlesney, Dustin DeMonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Impellitteri v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv01086
Petitioner:
Andrew Impellitteri
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Milner v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01480
Plaintiff:
Shawn Milner
Defendant:
USA, Bristol Police Department, Lance Podlesney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Martin et al
as 3:2021cv01465
Petitioner:
Andrew Cook
Respondent:
Martin and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kaminski v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
John S. Kaminski
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Corrections, UConn Health Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helmueller v. Howe
as 3:2021cv01127
Petitioner:
Andrew Jacob Helmueller and Sovereignty Joseph Helmueller Sovereign Freeman
Respondent:
Matt Howe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
