Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Wellpath LLC, Rachel Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
State of Nevada, NDOC, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Terrence Davis and Terrance Davis
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, Dugon, Nickles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coil v. State of Nevada
as 2:2022cv01428
Petitioner:
David Coil and David Andrew Coil
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pressler v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
James Mathes, Elko, City of, Steven Spring and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Pressler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressler v. Elko County, Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00670
Defendant:
James Mathes, Elko, City of, Steven Spring and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Pressler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv01754
Petitioner:
Demarene Andrew Coleman
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pham v. USA
as 3:2020cv00277
Petitioner:
Andrew Deng Pham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
