Cases 11 - 20 of 54
BROWN v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04690
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK BROWN
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY v. ARAMARK et al
as 2:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ABNEY
Defendant:
ARAMARK, CORIZON, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv04755
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN SHAW
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, FERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnich v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01476
Plaintiff:
Marshall Minnich
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC and Cumberland County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv03135
Plaintiff:
TYRESE HILL
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ARAMARK CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv06661
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05734
Plaintiff:
CARL DEJESUS
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INC., WEED , KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS et al v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2013cv04940
Plaintiff:
CARL A. DEJESUS, CARL TALTON and PIERRE FOLKS
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv04690
Plaintiff:
KEITH SIMMONS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EAVES v. SHOLEK et al
as 2:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRYANT EAVES
Defendant:
MARK SHOLEK, MONICA C., KEEFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
