Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Burt v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Naquita Burt
Defendant:
Ortiz, Riddle, Phil Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wertz v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01143
Petitioner:
Marcus Adam Wertz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sales v. Smith et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Gerber Sales
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer Whittley, Officer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Dunlap et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Officer Dunlap, Officer Whittley and Officer Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Ross
as 2:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Maureen Nicole Adams
Defendant:
Ms. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Adam Kieth Waldman and Adam Keith Waldman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Hamm, Thomas Woodfin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Adams
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartford v. Talladega County et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Hartford
Defendant:
Talladega County, Alabama, State of, Jeb Fannin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
