Cases 11 - 20 of 227
Keeton v. Dunlap et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Officer Dunlap, Officer Whittley and Officer Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Ross
as 2:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Maureen Nicole Adams
Defendant:
Ms. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldman v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Adam Kieth Waldman and Adam Keith Waldman
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Hamm, Thomas Woodfin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Adams
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartford v. Talladega County et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dale Hartford
Defendant:
Talladega County, Alabama, State of, Jeb Fannin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wertz v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Marcus Adam Wertz
Defendant:
Alabama, State of and Blount County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swindle v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv08029
Petitioner:
Adam Shane Swindle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lucas Bradley Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Murray, Paul Monk, Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
