Cases 11 - 20 of 1,573
Manuel Ortega et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosas, Manuel Ortega, Ricardo Rosas and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allison, Warden Neil McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shipley v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Shipley
Defendant:
Anise Adams and N. Malakkla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Molina v. Adams
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johan Molina
Defendant:
Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adams v. Dahl et al
as 1:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams
Defendant:
Andy Dahl, Fabiola Hernandez, Eric Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Molina v. Adams
as 2:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johan Molina
Defendant:
Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tracy Wendell Adams v. Doerer
as 2:2023cv09875
Petitioner:
Tracy Wendell Adams
Respondent:
Warden Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Powell v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv02275
Plaintiff:
Adam Randolph Powell
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Chance Andes and L. O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland et al v. Tucker et al
as 4:2023cv05312
Plaintiff:
Ivan V. Cleveland and Deveron Ratliff
Defendant:
Mr. Tucker, Mr. Gash, Mr, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dahl et al
as 1:2023at00957
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams
Defendant:
Andy Dahl, Fabiola Hernandez, Eric Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
