Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Wetzel v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2014cv01244
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner
as 13-31061
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden
Andrew Wetzel v. Bryan Williams, et al
as 13-30641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, ROBERT C. TANNER, KEITH BICKHAM and others
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, MATTHEW GAMBLE, JAMES LEBLANC and others
Wetzel v. Goodwin
as 2:2013cv03478
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden, KEITH BICKHAM, Deputy Warden, DARRYL MIZELL, Captain and others
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, KEITH BICKHAM, MICHAEL BARBER and others
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Darryl Mizell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner, Keith Bickham, Michael Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Wetzel v. Robert Tanner, et al
as 13-30098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW DAVID WETZEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. TANNER, Warden, Rayburn Correctional Center, KEITH BICKHAM, Deputy Warden, Rayburn Correctinal Center, MICHAEL HARRELL, Major, Rayburn Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
