Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Johnson v. Stange, et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Unknown Armstrong, Major Unknown Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Christopher C. Armstrong
Defendant:
Christina Ward, Scott Westlacht and Robert Shively
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Fluharty et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Vandergriff
as 4:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Joshua K. Armstrong
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Fuwell et al
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Taylor Fuwell, Heather Tidwell, Heather Annesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Precythe et al
as 4:2021cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dion Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Ludwick, Jason Lewis, Unknown Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston Da-G.O.D. v. Precythe et al
as 1:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Brittany Kitchen, Lorrene Armstrong, Tonya Young and others
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A. Kingston Da-G.O.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Gorham, et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Bryan Gorham, Jason Lewis, Alonna Wigfall and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Nicholas Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
