Cases 11 - 20 of 206
Edwards v. Cambell et al
as 3:2022cv03176
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edwards
Defendant:
Jack Cambell, Donald Trump, Mary Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Dexstin Bryant
Defendant:
. Smith, Chad Kolitwenzew and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Winford Bryant
Defendant:
Kim Butler, Barack Obama and Nigel Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields et al v. Liberty Health Care Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv04050
Plaintiff:
Justin Fields, Dothan K Rogers, Lester J Collier and others
Defendant:
Liberty Health Care Corporation, Steve Bryant, Josh Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Jerome Combs Detention Center
as 2:2022cv02056
Plaintiff:
Dexstin Bryant
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Kassar v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Monzer Al-Kassar
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00693
Defendant:
C/O Swisher, Lieutenant Miller, C/O Hagston and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinder v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2021cv02414
Plaintiff:
Bryant Kinder
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys and IDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
