Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Bailey v. Ransom et al
as 2:2022cv04478
Petitioner:
William Bailey and WILLIAM BAILEY, JR.
Respondent:
Superintendent Kevin Ransom, District Attorney LAWRENCE KRASNER, Attorney General JOSHUA SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Peters
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc., Shelby Bailey, LPN, Perry County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUMBA v. KOWAL et al
as 5:2022cv02940
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
KEITH KOWAL, MATTHEW BAILEY, JOHN GOLETZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BADGER v. PEREZ et al
as 5:2021cv04747
Plaintiff:
PETER BADGER
Defendant:
JUSTIN PEREZ, DENNIS RIVAS, MATTHEW BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. P.I.C.C.
as 2:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
P.I.C.C., C/O: GIBSON, C/O: BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parra v. Finley et al
as 1:2021cv00973
Defendant:
Michael Bailey, Scott Finley and Mr. Radle
Plaintiff:
Jorge Parra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Lycoming County Prison et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Nate Edler, Chase Willard, Lt. Harry Entz and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00179
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BAILEY
Defendant:
MARC COPOZZA, ALBERT WOOD and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina et al v. Kauffman et al
as 4:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jason Cisne, Vann L. Bailey, Angel Irizarry and others
Defendant:
John Wetzel, G. Ralston, K. Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
