Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Benion v. Drinkert et al
as 2:2018cv13612
Defendant:
John and Joe Doe, Gerald Mitchell, Derrick Drinkert and others
Plaintiff:
Harry D. Benion
Jones #412981 v. Trinity Food Service Group et al
as 2:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Tremain Vernon Jones #412981
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service Group, Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Trinity Food Service Group et al
as 2:2018cv11116
Plaintiff:
Tremain Vernon Jones
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service Group, Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Jackson #146503 et al v. McPherson et al
as 1:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson #146503, Patrick McPherson, Norman Kuhn and others
Defendant:
Matt Swab, Joel Johnson, Billy Windom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson-Moore v. Martin et al
as 1:2016cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shaun Nicholas Carson-Moore
Defendant:
Paul Martin, Kitty Buchner and Brad Bulk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Rapelje et al
as 2:2016cv10234
Plaintiff:
Charles Conway
Defendant:
Lloyd W. Rapelje, Glenn Kusey and Brad Purves
Lumbard #878389 v. St. Joseph County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
Nathan K. Lumbard #878389
Defendant:
St. Joseph County Sheriff Department, Michigan Department of Corrections, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyle #872579 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2015cv00712
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dee Kyle #872579, II
Defendant:
Mark Waichum, Jame Watson, Chad Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horacek #218347 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Daniel Horacek #218347
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns , Michael Martin and Brad Purvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
