Cases 11 - 20 of 1,038
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Defendant:
JOE GIGLIOTTI, R. BRAINIFF, ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
MS. JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert-Brown v. USA
as 1:2024cv01087
Petitioner:
Anthony Gilbert-Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Neitz
as 4:2024cv01076
Defendant:
Lieutenant Neitz
Plaintiff:
Adam Joseph Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv02862
Defendant:
EDWARDS JONES, LAKEYSHA COOPER and MARCOS ORTIZ
Plaintiff:
CORDIRO BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Defendant:
R. BOLLINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R.A. SETH JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. LADDERMORE et al
as 2:2024cv02756
Defendant:
LT. LINDEY, SGT. LADDERMORE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CORDIRO BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ricard
as 3:2024cv00921
Respondent:
Warden Ricard
Petitioner:
Mark Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Pennsylvania Parole Board
Petitioner:
Timothy Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Hollibaugh et al
as 4:2024cv00799
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Ken Hollibaugh
Petitioner:
Noel L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
MS. BOBBI JO SALAMON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNYSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
