Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Chae v. Rodriguez et al
as 8:2013cv00166
Defendant:
Stephanie Bruhn, Robert P. Houston, Mike Kenny and others
Plaintiff:
Bong H. Chae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Tia v. Casey, et al
as 12-17148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CASEY, ACO Casey, Correctional Officer at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in hsi individual capacity, CHIYOME L. FUKINO, M.D., Director at the Department of Health, sued in her individual and official capacities, NOLAN ESPINDA, Halawa Correctional Facility Warden, sued in his individual and official capacities and others
Tia v. Casey et al
as 1:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Casey, Chiyome L. Fukino, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruffin v. Nebraska Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv03058
Defendant:
Dr. S. Bruhn, Dr. E. Cambell, Robert P. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrosio Salazar, Jr. v. Mental Health Board, et al
as 11-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ambrosio Salazar, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Mental Health Board, Platte County, Norfolk Regional Center, John Kroll, Director R.N. and others
SaLazar v. Mental Health Board et al
as 4:2011cv03048
Defendant:
Stephanie Bruhn, Michael Gett, Carl K. Hart, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ambrosio SaLazar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallardo v. Waterman et al
as 8:2007cv00357
Petitioner:
Jose L. Gallardo
Respondent:
Elizabeth Waterman, Dawson County Mental Health Board, Nebraska Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Prosser v. Meredith Allen, et al
as 07-1484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Christopher Lee Prosser
Defendant:
Victor Bruhn, Kimberly Swindler, C.O.I., Steve Ragan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Meredith Allen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
