Cases 11 - 20 of 20
WRIGHT v. WYNN et al
as 2:2020cv00062
Defendant:
F/N/U Purcell, RICHARD BROWN, F/N/U Ammerman and others
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00307
Petitioner:
CARLTON LAMONT CHANEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HILLMAN v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00548
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
CARLTON HILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00634
Petitioner:
Carlton P Wilson
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCANLAN v. MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORR et al
as 1:2017cv01643
Defendant:
MR BROOKS, CARLTON, DUVALL RESIDENTIAL WORK RELEASE CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A SCANLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scanlan v. Marion County Community Corr et al
as 3:2017cv00371
Defendant:
Marion County Community Corr, Duvall Residential Work Release Center, Mr Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
William A Scanlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01717
Petitioner:
CARLTON LAMONT CHANEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CHANEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01624
Petitioner:
CARLTON LAMONT CHANEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STEVENSON v. OSBURN
as 2:2008cv00354
Petitioner:
CARLTON STEVENSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL OSBURN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCINTOSH SR v. THE ADMIN. OF THE JEFFERSON CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 4:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
CARLTON EVAN MCINTOSH SR
Defendant:
THE ADMIN. OF THE JEFFERSON CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT., WILLIAM BILL ANDREWS, KEN BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
