Cases 11 - 20 of 83
ANDREWS v. MAY et al
as 2:2016cv03636
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANDREWS
Respondent:
GERALD MAY, CCP OF PHILA. CTY, CITY OF PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDREWS v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2015cv05717
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANDREWS
Respondent:
MICHELLE FARRELL, CCP OF PHILA. CTY. and CITY OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jason Parker v. Sam Haaz, et al
as 15-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM HAAZ, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DAVID C. SHUTER, JUDGE, PERRY DEMARCO and others
PARKER v. SHUTER et al
as 2:2015cv05188
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID C. SHUTER, MEANS, MCCLENDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Parker v. Philadelphia Prison System, et al
as 15-3144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, M. FARRELL, Warden of Curren-Fromhold Cor. Fac., LOUIS GIORLA, Commissioner of Phila. Prison Sys and others
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv04832
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PARKER v. HAAZ et al
as 2:2015cv03474
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
SAM HAAZ, DAVID C. SHUTER, PERRY DEMARCO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv07384
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL WALKER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CITY OF PHILA. PA JUDICIAL SYSTEM/COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILA. RECORDS DEPT. and PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM RECORDS DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY. et al
as 2:2014cv06162
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Defendant:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY., U.S.A. CORPORATION, CITY OF PHILA., MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv03764
Plaintiff:
DARNELL BOYD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, PPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
