Cases 11 - 20 of 26
(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv02260
Defendant:
Francine Tournour, Lilia Alonso, James Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
James Nelson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ento v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv01894
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health, Gienten Doll, Kiejuahn and others
Plaintiff:
Christian David Ento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Nelson v. City of Sacramento, et al.
as 2:2019cv01841
Plaintiff:
James Nelson and James Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Francine Tournour, Lilia Alonso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Hampton v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv00851
Defendant:
Law Office of Michael D. Long, Robert C. Hight, Kevin Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Andrew Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Humes v. Sac. Co. DHHS et al
as 2:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jon Humes
Defendant:
Sac. Co. DHHS, City of Sacramento, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kane v. State of California et al
as 2:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Daniel Michael Kane
Defendant:
People of the State of Calfornia, State of California, City of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. City of Sacramento, et al
as 2:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Coleman
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, T. Virga, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Chavez et al
as 2:2015cv01695
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Michael Chavez, United States of America, Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Falk et al
as 2:2015cv00673
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Falk, O'Brien, Andris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Scully, et al.
as 2:2014cv00713
Plaintiff:
Willy Carl Lyons
Defendant:
Jan Scully, John Goldthorpe, City of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
