Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ayer v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01134
Petitioner:
Clement Makung Ayer
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clement v. Apker
as 4:2011cv00832
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Petitioner:
Leonard Alexander Clement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patterson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02364
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Bailey et al
as 2:2010cv01571
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
Unknown Bailey, Unknown Quintero, Unknown Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Brewer et al
as 4:2010cv00429
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Charles Ryan, Daryl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. USA
as 4:2009cv00229
Petitioner:
Ernesto Clemente Romero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Clement v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2007cv02047
Plaintiff:
Jay Alvin Clement
Defendant:
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Joseph M. Arpaio, John J MacIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv01692
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Paul D Clement, A Gonzales and others
Defendant:
G W Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fimbrez v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00433
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Fimbrez
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Donna H Clement, Steve Ickes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv01297
Plaintiff:
Samuel Acy Wesley, II
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Charles Ryan, Charles Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
