Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Coleman v. Parris
as 3:2022mc00049
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman and Welsey Dawone Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris, FNU Olroyed, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whiteside v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Cederick Whiteside
Defendant:
Jeff Smith, Jackie Bausman, Sandra Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02193
Petitioner:
Frederick Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parks v. Boyd et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Bert Boyd, A.W. Cobble, Cutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Felts et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Felts, Correctional Officer Coleman, Correctional Officer Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweatt v. Hininger et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Sweatt
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Warden Grady Perry, f/n/u Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Dowling et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Shawn Dannels, Daron Hall, Jack E. Dowling and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Shelby County Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv02909
Defendant:
Shelby County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Alex Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watison v. Perry, Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00081
Defendant:
f/n/u White, Larry Coleman, (f/n/u) Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond King Belal Watison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
