Cases 11 - 20 of 343
Hicks v. Everyone Who Is A Judicial Official That Threatened My Family
as 6:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Larry Coleman Hicks
Defendant:
Everyone Who Is A Judicial Official That Threatened My Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Larry Coleman Hicks
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Britt and Warden Michael Feazell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Biden
as 6:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Larry Coleman Hicks
Defendant:
U.S. President Joseph R Biden, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Coleman et al
as 4:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Preston Lee Dean
Defendant:
Rebecca Coleman, Nathaniel Robertson and Irene O. Oyolu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Culver et al
as 4:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
Roderick A. Brooks
Defendant:
Daniel Culver, Major Garrett Simmons, Donna Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00451
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown v. Rader et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ethan Thomas Brown
Defendant:
Robert J. Rader, Raye Carnes, Ktisha Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Coleman et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Byron Keith Harmon
Defendant:
R. Coleman, Barbara Kent, Rachael Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Gregory et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Preston L Dean
Defendant:
Jackie Gregory, Ginger Fabrizio, FNU Lenoez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
