Cases 11 - 20 of 26
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv07145
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
ELLIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv06998
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
ELLIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALFORD et al v. WOJCHIECHOWICZ et al
as 3:2015cv06750
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
BO ROBINSON PSYCHOLOGIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv03783
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
CHARLES ELLIS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv03484
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY JAIL and RAYA-SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Alford v. Laquise
as 14-3350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LAQUISE, Hearing Examiner, DORINA VARNER, Chief Hearing Examiner, JOHN WETZEL and others
Craig Alford v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
as 14-2944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and MARK STEVEN MATTHEWS
Alford v. Munley et al
as 1:2014cv00921
Plaintiff:
Craig Alford
Defendant:
James Munley, Thomas Blewitt and Karoline Mehalchick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALFORD v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv01040
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, THOMAS R. CALCAGNI, JEFFREY KOZUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Alford v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 14-1047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
MARK STEVEN MATTHEWS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
