Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Felder v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00911
Plaintiff: Cecil Felder
Defendant: Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Partidge
as 2:2014cv00956
Plaintiff: John Howard Sherman
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Defendant: Daniel Cecil Partidge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Kinderknect
as 2:2014cv00955
Plaintiff: John Howard Sherman
Defendant: Gabriel Kinderknect and Daniel Cecil Partridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. City of Jasper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01678
Plaintiff: Cecil M Ferguson
Defendant: City of Jasper, Sonny Posey, Jeremy Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Thomas et al
as 4:2011cv01844
Plaintiff: Cecil Wallace
Defendant: Kim Thomas, Hetzel, Peterson and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Byrd We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00435
Plaintiff: Cecil Wallace
Defendant: Robert Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Reese
as 1:2009cv02434
Petitioner: Cecil Ray Frye, Jr.
Respondent: Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arrington v. Allen et al
as 2:2008cv02435
Plaintiff: Earnest Lee Arrington
Defendant: Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, C Gordy and others
Miscellaneou: staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arrington v. Allen et al (INMATE2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00962
Plaintiff: Earnest Lee Arrington
Defendant: Richard Allen, Gary Hetzel, C. Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glenn v. Whitley et al
as 7:2007cv02199
Plaintiff: Cecil Wayne Glenn
Defendant: James Whitley, Miller, Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?