Cases 11 - 20 of 273
Chandler v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00503
Petitioner:
Corey Ledon Chandler
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Lane
as 1:2022cv00404
Petitioner:
Timothy L. Chandler
Respondent:
Mike Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yoo v. The Federal Bureau of Prison Director et al
as 4:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Heon Jong Yoo
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prison Director, South Central Regional Director, FCI Fort Worth Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ventress v. Rayford
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Chandler Kyle Ventress
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ventress v. Abbott et al
as 5:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Chandler Kyle Ventress
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Warden Phonso Rayford and Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00570
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Waldrup v. Maginnis et al
as 4:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lee Waldrup
Defendant:
Patty Maginnis, Paul Damico, Modesto Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Montes et al
as 1:2021cv00410
Defendant:
Cindy A. Montes, Corpus Christi Parole Office, Wichita County Parole Division and others
Plaintiff:
Pete Edward Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waldrup v. Henderson et al
as 4:2020cv03451
Defendant:
Inger Chandler, Patty Maginnis, Paul Damico and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lee Waldrup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Porschia et al
as 3:2020cv03079
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Malvina Porschia, NFN Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Idris-Jakari Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
