Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Bingham v. City of Charlotte
as 3:2020cv00248
Defendant:
City of Charlotte
Plaintiff:
Trentair Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2018ct03329
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County, State of North Carolina and City of Charlotte
Plaintiff:
Eddricco L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. COOPER et al
as 1:2018cv00146
Plaintiff:
EDDRICCO LISHAUN BROWN-BEY
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, MARCUS PLESCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017ct03253
Plaintiff:
Eddricco L. Brown
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County and City of Charlotte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Antonio Mosley
Defendant:
David W. Williams, City of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
William Henry Morris
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department and Alex Saine
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Monroe et al
as 3:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Long, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Monroe, E. M. Riley, Ryan Pagan and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Oakes v. Monroe et al
as 3:2011cv00595
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Oakes, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Monroe, Joan Hummel, Ricky Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Springs v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2011cv00588
Petitioner:
Malcolm Springs
Respondent:
City of Charlotte , Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department , Mitchell Reedy and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
John D. Matthews
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Stephen Iyevbele, K. Scheimreif and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
