Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Riley v. Paz et al
as 1:2019cv08436
Defendant:
Roberto Paz, Jr and City of Chicago Police Department
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lavoris Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Chicago Police Dept.
as 1:2019cv07923
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv06951
Defendant:
A. Gemignani, Eddie Johnson, City of Chicago Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felder v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv06570
Defendant:
Balles, Mallneix, City of Chicago Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Wakee Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Warden et al
as 1:2019cv05152
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Department, Robert Shuller, Health Services Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. The City Of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2019cv03007
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Dervis Demirovic, Picken and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGraw v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, City of Chicago Police Dept., Mary Ellen and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin McGraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Prochoska et al
as 1:2019cv00883
Defendant:
S. Wilson, Donna Walsh, Charles Prochoska and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv07341
Defendant:
TH Williams, Mr.. McGrone, JL Lundruf and others
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siller v. City of Chicago / Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv07288
Defendant:
City of Chicago / Police Dept., Officer Munizzi, William Kelvin and others
Plaintiff:
Dorian Siller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
