Cases 11 - 20 of 33
SCOTT et al v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
WALTER SCOTT and PRZEMYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL RESNICK, G. MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
WALTER SCOTT and PRZENYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. CORIZON INC. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv04141
Plaintiff:
COSME RIVERA
Defendant:
CORIZON INC. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2015cv03059
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WELLS
Defendant:
M. FARRELL, ABELLO, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSES v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02463
Plaintiff:
ROYAL MOSES
Defendant:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) CORIZON INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Wetzle et al
as 3:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Freddie Ramirez, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzle, Robert M. Wolff, Christopher H. Oppman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
LORENZO SIMS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, CORIZON INC., NANCY FLYNN MCGARVIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGARRELL v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
SHIRVIN MCGARRELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORO v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv07552
Plaintiff:
RICHARD TORO
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, GIORLA, FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
