Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Penton v. USA
as 5:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Jacob Cory Penton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Pursley v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
Samuel Cory Pursley
Respondent:
Warden, Joe Corley Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pursley v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 9:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Samuel Cory Pursley
Respondent:
Warden, Joe Corley Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jacobs v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Cory Jacobs
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mitchell v. Marques
as 1:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Cory Carnell Mitchell
Respondent:
Rick Marques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Satterwhite v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Cory Satterwhite
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Collier et al
as 7:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cornelius Brown
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, A. Lozada, Cory Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Lyons et al
as 9:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bart Thomas Moore
Defendant:
Byron Lyons, Jamie Richardson, Kayce Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Martin et al
as 3:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Cory McCray
Defendant:
Deputy Monte Marshall Martin and Galveston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) et al
as 9:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Cory Martinez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (CID) and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
