Cases 11 - 20 of 161
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniels v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Nathan Daniels
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glass v. McKnight et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Ricky Glass
Defendant:
Corporal Daniel McKnight, CO II Rowe, Sgt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lee Adkins
Defendant:
Camryn T. Daniels, Eddy Arthur, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ushery v. Lovett
as 3:2022cv00223
Petitioner:
Daniel L. Ushery, Jr.
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ushery v. Lovett
as 3:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Daniel L. Ushery, Jr.
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Greear v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00389
Petitioner:
Daniel Jay Donald Greear, II
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Greear v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00390
Petitioner:
Daniel Jay Donald Greear, II
Respondent:
State of Tennessee and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniels v. Shirk et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Owen Daniels
Defendant:
Shirk, Hazelton U.S.P. Medical, Hazelton U.S.P. Compound and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniels v. Barber et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Owen Daniels
Defendant:
LT Barber, LT Perez, Gabby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
