Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Robert Keys v. Candace Torres, et al
as 16-41518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL KEYS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER II CANDACE TORRES, CLERK 3 KIESHA COLLINS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION and others
Diaz-Guillen v. Nooth et al
as 2:2016cv01546
Petitioner:
David Diaz-Guillen
Respondent:
Mark Nooth and Snake River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liu v. Lynch et al
as 1:2014cv04198
Plaintiff:
Jicheng Liu
Defendant:
James Lynch, Anita Alvarez, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liu v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2014cv02982
Plaintiff:
Jicheng Liu
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, James Lynch, Jack O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liu v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv03017
Plaintiff:
Jicheng Liu
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Anita Alvarez, David Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Florida Attorney General
as 2:2012cv00034
Petitioner:
David Diaz
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Monroe et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
William Monroe
Defendant:
Jennifer Smith, David Diaz and E. Metz
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Trevino et al
as 5:2010cv00968
Defendant:
Raymond Almendarez, Matt Barber, Sandra Castenada and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2009cv00656
Petitioner:
David Diaz
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Diaz
as 1:2007cv04171
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
