Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Gausnell v. Livingston et al
as 1:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Clayton Gausnell
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, David M Fortner, Robert Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King, Jr. v. Bailey et al
as 3:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracey H. Bailey, Chris Lacox, Asst. Warden, Wayne Brewer, Asst. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King, Jr. v. Bailey et al
as 4:2013cv03603
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr.
Defendant:
Tracey H. Bailey, Chris Lacox, Asst. Warden, Wayne Brewer, Asst. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sepulveda v. Stephens
as 5:2013cv00981
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
David M Sepulveda
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Capps v. Gomez et al
as 3:2013cv04013
Plaintiff:
David M Capps
Defendant:
NFN Gomez and Johnson County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sepulveda v. Stephens DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT
as 4:2013cv02921
Petitioner:
David M Sepulveda
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02289
Petitioner:
David M. Wright
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Gillsel et al
as 4:2012cv03742
Plaintiff:
Destry E. Thomas
Defendant:
Cody W. Gillsel, Steven T. Miller and David M. Forrest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Livingston et al
as 4:2012cv03679
Plaintiff:
Forrest Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Robert D. Herrera, Carey S. Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv03468
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, James H. Kent, Byron Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
