Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Chappell v. Jamie Woods, et al
as 19-3355
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR DAVID WARREN, UNIT MANAGEMENT CHIEF CYNTHIA DAVIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMIE WOODS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD JAMES CHAPPELL
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benn v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv20198
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Ivan Nacil, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Benn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burfitt v. Erving et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt, II
Defendant:
M. Erving, M. Esaum, R. Buroughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Lane County Sheriff Office et al
as 6:2018cv00329
Defendant:
Lane County Sheriff Office and Oregon Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Travis David Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
