Cases 11 - 20 of 48
DAY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2022cv00369
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Breaton et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Smith, III
Defendant:
Korey Breaton, Fisher and Day
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spann-El v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Richard A Spann-El
Defendant:
Indiana State of, MCF Defendants, Drew Tornau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARNER-JONES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02928
Plaintiff:
TARRA GARNER-JONES
Defendant:
ROB CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
French Mason and French Mason-Bey
Defendant:
William Hyatte, J Shoffner, A Miller and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KILBURN v. DECATUR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
as 1:2021cv01552
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and JUDGE TIMOTHY B DAY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE KILBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00298
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Corey Day
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Day v. Jolly et al
as 2:2021cv00120
Defendant:
T. Jolly, A. Chonowski, M. Zembala and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony H. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY v. WATSON
as 2:2020cv00362
Petitioner:
ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Graves v. Hake et al
as 3:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Isaac Valencia, David Taylor, Kristina J Day and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron M Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
