Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Eugene Schuler v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7762
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE PETER SCHULER
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Gary Wall v. Jeffrey Artrip
as 16-7308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ARTRIP, Delta-Building Unit Manager, TORI RAIFORD, Counselor/Unit Manager, J. FANNIN, Lieutenant and others
Michael James v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6776
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL K. JAMES
Respondent - Appellant:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director VDOC
William Arnold v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6247
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM EARL ARNOLD
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director VDOC
Hamilton Swart, III v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAMILTON H. SWART, III
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief Correctional Operations, FREDERICK SCHILLING, Director of Health Services and others
Edmundo Coto v. Harold Clarke
as 15-7544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUNDO M. COTO
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director VDOC, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Superintendent/Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Paul Thompson, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC, DAVID B. EVERETT, Regional Operations Chief, VDOC Eastern Region, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Bernard Richardson v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6699
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Daniel Tomlin v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6226
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL L. TOMLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
