Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Owens v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2019cv00244
Defendant:
Edward Lowe, Alisa Hammock Evans, Kevin Sprayberry and others
Plaintiff:
James Owens, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Phillips v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Gabrielle Illa, Mikeal Camp and Kevin Sprayberry
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rendon v. The Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2019cv01582
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rendon
Defendant:
The Jail Administrator, The Medical Director, The Fulton County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00914
Plaintiff:
Juan Gabriel Rangel and $507,345.00 in U.S. Currency
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Humphrey et al
as 4:2018cv00181
Defendant:
FNU McGaba, FNU Harvey, Timothy Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Illa et al
as 4:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Gabriel Illa, Timothy Brooks, FNU Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Illa et al
as 6:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Gabriel Illa, Georgia Department of Corrections and Georgia Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Gabriel Illa, FNU Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Stanley Tyrone Brooks
Defendant:
Kevin Sprayberry, Alissa Hammock and Gabriel Illa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
