Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Gill v. Clarke
as 2:2019cv00441
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Petitioner: Lashawn Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. Bishop et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00796
Defendant: Judge Herbert C. Gill, Clarence M. Jenkins, Michael Joerstel and others
Plaintiff: James Henry Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Clarke et al
as 2:2018cv00552
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Vandermark and others
Plaintiff: Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2018cv00408
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Nurse Mays, Sergeant Tisdale and others
Plaintiff: Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooden-Harris v. Fenner et al
as 2:2018cv00332
Plaintiff: Wesley Joseph Wooden-Harris
Defendant: Fenner and Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Bishop, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff: James Henry Simpson
Defendant: Mortrsh Disha, Michael Poerstel, Brook Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Circuit Court of City of Richmond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00470
Plaintiff: James Henry Simpson
Defendant: Circuit Court of City of Richmond, Nuckels S Bivinly, Holter Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Clarke
as 2:2016cv00709
Petitioner: Lashawn Gill
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LordMaster v. Birckhead et al
as 1:2015cv00618
Plaintiff: Frankie Jae LordMaster
Defendant: Ms. Birckhead, S. Hatch, W. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?