Cases 11 - 20 of 176
Garcia v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
Jose R. Garcia
Respondent:
R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Velez Garcia v. Barraza
as 4:2023cv00404
Petitioner:
Roberto Yamil Velez Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Rickard
as 1:2023cv00197
Petitioner:
Carlos Garcia
Respondent:
Acting Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. Garcia et al
as 1:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
Jalil S. Reed
Defendant:
Lt. Garcia, Lt. M. Conrad, C.O. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant:
c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. USA
as 1:2022cv01739
Petitioner:
Allen Malik Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GARCIA v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv03864
Plaintiff:
NOEL GARCIA
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and LYNN ABRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
NOEL GARCIA
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and JERI SMOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Irwin Garcia
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garcia v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
