Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Ronny Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas D
as 18-50406
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNY GENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gene Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-11373
Petitioner - Appellant:
GENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Ronny Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51341
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNY GENE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. Stephens
as 6:2014cv00019
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv02584
Petitioner:
Gene Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2013cv00354
Petitioner:
GENE SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2013cv00267
Petitioner:
GENE SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronny Smith v. Scott Wilkerson
as 12-51182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNY GENE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT HENRY WILKERSON
Ronny v. Wilkerson
as 6:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ronny Gene Smith
Defendant:
Scott Henry Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tommy Hall v. Prosecuting Attorney C. Jones, et al
as 12-2775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tommy D. Hall
Defendant - Appellee:
Prosecuting Attorney Carlton Jones, Kate Carter, J. Savage, Arresting Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
