Cases 11 - 20 of 158
ASBERRY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER et al
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER, ROBERT TOOLE, JACK RANDALL SAULS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. ADAMS
as 1:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NORMAN O GLENN
Respondent:
WARDEN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GLENN v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
NORMAN O GLENN
Defendant:
JUDGE JOE C BISHOP, DISTRICT ATTORNEY RON SMITH, PATRICIA LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles Hartman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Warden Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruton v. Berry
as 1:2022cv02960
Petitioner:
Glenn Bruton
Respondent:
Walter Berry and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baird v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Marty Lamar Baird
Defendant:
Warden Brooks Benton, Z. Jones, Betterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Howard, Davoric Tilman, Michael Anthony Thomas and others
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Reynold, Capt. Deese, Major Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Lumpkin Co.
as 2:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn Newell
Defendant:
Lumpkin Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. LOCKETTE et al
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
VERNON MELVIN GLENN, JR
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIE LOCKETTE, JUSTIN MANN, JERAL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Benton et al
as 4:2021cv00047
Defendant:
C. Worthen, Cifuentes, Stratton and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
