Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Merino v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv02242
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Merino
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI-Memphis, United States Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNutt v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv02873
Plaintiff:
Jesse R. McNutt
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons, Bruce Pearson, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rojas v. Pearson et al
as 2:2008cv02789
Plaintiff:
Roman Rojas
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Deborah Gonzales, Dorothy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Todd v. Federal Correctional Center Memphis et al
as 2:2008cv02224
Plaintiff:
Xavier S. Todd
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Center Memphis, Jaun Castillo, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Pearson, et al
as 2:2008cv02112
Plaintiff:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Dawson, Deborah Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. USA
as 2:2008cv00022
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Aldifonso F Gonzales, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lin v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02513
Petitioner:
Li Lin
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Julie L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2007cv02424
Plaintiff:
Newton Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bruce Pearson, Dion E. Franklund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bowen v. Dawson et al
as 2:2007cv02171
Plaintiff:
Jason Bowen
Defendant:
Dawson, Millen, Gillien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
