Cases 11 - 20 of 27
REX v. NARATIL et al
as 5:2012cv04605
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ALAN REX
Defendant:
LORA NARATIL, ELIZABETH YUDT, GREGG HELLWIG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREGGS v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv06997
Plaintiff:
BRUCE GREGGS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILLIAMS v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv06565
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, JOYCE ADAMS, GREGG PEOPLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv06201
Plaintiff:
LINDELL ALI PAYNE
Defendant:
HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS, GREGG, RIVEREA/CLAYTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRITTONDEN v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2011cv00220
Petitioner:
GREGG CRITTONDEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAYNE v. THE ENTITY KNOWN; AS HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv04671
Plaintiff:
LYNDELL ALI PAYNE
Defendant:
THE ENTITY KNOWN; AS HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS, GREGG, RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Wagner et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
Wagner, Dixon, Donna Zickefiose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
