Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Douglas, Brandon S. Lowery, D. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LING v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A LING, JR
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, D STOLTZFUS, LUCILITA SALVADOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TIDWELL v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00514
Plaintiff:
HELEN K TIDWELL
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, J RODRIGUEZ, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarns v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv80762
Plaintiff:
Hercules Yarns
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Logan v. Brad Whitehead, et al
as 15-11019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD WHITEHEAD, Asst. Warden, MILTON D. WILLIAMS, Colonel, DR. HERCULE, Doctor and others
Campbell et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014cv01559
Plaintiff:
Corey Campbell , Robert Conley , Sinohe Hercules and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2014cv01226
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams , David Atzet , Derrico Aubrey and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2014cv01657
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams , David Atzet , Derrico Aubrey and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund Brown, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01118
Plaintiff:
Hercules Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hercules v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv00829
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hercules
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
