Cases 11 - 20 of 26
CULBREATH v. Reeves et al
as 4:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE CULBREATH
Defendant:
ROBERT S REEVES, KATHY S PALMER, JOY H CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Heidt et al
as 3:2017cv00138
Defendant:
Vanessa Heidt and Nevada Department of Corrections Supervisors
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rangel v. State of Nevada ex rel. NDOC et al
as 3:2017cv00128
Defendant:
Vanessa Heidt, Patrick Moreda, Nevada, State Of and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowell Brown v. 5th District Court of Appeal, et al
as 15-14919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COWELL NEMOY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
5TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, Chief Justices or Head of Office, BOB WATTLES, Ninth Judicial Circuit Judge, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
BROWN v. FLORIDA BAR
as 4:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
COWELL NEMOY BROWN
Defendant:
FLORIDA BAR, 5TH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, BOB WATTLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Travis et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Lt. Brown, Bryner and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Hines v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-17841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT W. NEVEN, ISIDRO BACA, DANIEL HEIDT and others
Hines v. Neven et al
as 2:2011cv01481
Defendant:
C/O Anderson, Isidro Baca, Marguerite Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cate, et al.
as 1:2011cv01267
Plaintiff:
S. Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, R. Lopez, N. Comaites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks v. Comites et al
as 1:2011cv01180
Plaintiff:
Arthur Weeks
Defendant:
K. Comites, C. Gipson, D. Overly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
