Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Akassy v. The New York Daily News et al
as 1:2014cv01725
Plaintiff:
Hughes-Denver Akassy
Defendant:
The New York Daily News, Shayna Jacobs, Melissa Grace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendall v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2013cv08573
Plaintiff:
Cyril N. Kendall
Defendant:
Bill Hutchinson, John Doyle, Mortimer B. Zuckerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seabrook v. The New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv06620
Plaintiff:
Calvin Seabrook
Defendant:
The New York City Dept. of Corrections, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Leonard et al
as 1:2013cv05454
Plaintiff:
DeSean Gaither
Defendant:
Leonard, Levy, Hutchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. Watson et al
as 9:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Alton Hutchinson
Defendant:
John Watson, Eamonn Trainor and Janet Koupash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03619
Defendant:
City of New York, C.O. DuBois, C.O. Faulkner and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jeffers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05850
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lewis
Defendant:
Warden John Doe of C-95, C.O. Jacobs, C.O. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrissette v. Cripps et al
as 1:2010cv08795
Plaintiff:
Randy Suggs Morrissette
Defendant:
Cripps, Hutchinson and Freemantle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahman v. AMKC Warden (Mr. Cripps) et al
as 1:2010cv04402
Defendant:
AMKC Warden (Mr. Cripps), Hutchinson (Officer) and Ortiz (Officer)
Plaintiff:
Malik Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. Unger
as 1:2010cv02385
Petitioner:
David Hutchinson
Respondent:
D. Unger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
